United Nations Raises Alarm Over Pakistan Amendment That Undermines Supreme Court Judicial Authority

International News:  The United Nations has reacted strongly to Pakistan’s recent approval of the 26th Constitutional Amendment. According to officials, this modification could limit the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and allow a newly created Federal Constitutional Court to take over crucial legal functions. UN Human Rights High Commissioner Volker Türk said this move threatens judicial independence and allows political forces to step into court matters. The UN believes this poses serious risks to democracy and basic governance principles.

What Did The UN Say?

In an official press statement, Volker Türk warned that altering the legal structure may weaken military accountability and undermine the rule of law. He stated that such amendments could pave the way for political interference in judicial decisions. According to Türk, the amendment not only affects justice delivery but also reduces transparency and fairness. He emphasised that strong and independent judiciary is a foundation of any democratic nation and altering it could lead to instability.

What Does Amendment Intend To Do?

The 26th Constitutional Amendment was passed on 13 November to establish a Federal Constitutional Court. Observers say the new court may gradually take over powers from the existing Supreme Court. Analysts claim this step can shrink the top court’s authority to only civil and criminal matters. Questions are being raised whether the government is trying to bypass judicial scrutiny in sensitive cases. Critics also fear this could result in selective interpretation of constitutional laws.

How Does It Impact Democracy?

United Nations officials believe the change could weaken democratic systems in Pakistan. Volker Türk said that judicial power must remain separate from politics to maintain fairness. If judges face pressure from ruling authorities, democratic processes may collapse. According to experts, the amendment could lead to increased centralisation and reduced checks on power. Civil society groups warn that without a strong judiciary, citizens will find it harder to defend their rights.

Why Raise Military Accountability Concern?

The UN expressed concern that limiting Supreme Court authority might reduce oversight over security forces. According to Türk, courts play a vital role in questioning unlawful actions carried out by military or administrative elements. Weakening their powers may allow unchecked operations without proper investigations. Analysts fear this could raise risk of human rights violations. International observers say such changes could damage Pakistan’s global credibility in matters of justice and rights protection.

Can Judiciary Face Political Influence?

The statement by the UN warns that political involvement in judicial matters may rise once the amendment becomes fully operational. If courts are controlled or influenced by decision-makers in government, people may lose trust in the justice system. Analysts fear that strategic cases might be redirected away from Supreme Court examination. Some experts also believe this could suppress dissenting voices and prevent legal challenges against controversial governance decisions.

What Is Path Ahead For Pakistan?

Human rights experts ask Pakistan to reconsider the amendment or ensure strict safeguards to protect judicial independence. They suggest engaging with international bodies to avoid constitutional crisis. According to reports, internal legal forums may challenge the decision through petitions. Observers believe pressure from global organisations can compel the government to review its stance. For now, the future of Pakistan’s Supreme Court authority remains uncertain as debate continues around this amendment.